Grocery stores realize savings with reach-in cooler and freezer motor upgrades
Grocery stores operate on tight, sometimes fluctuating, profit margins. Last year, operating profits fell 9% from the previous year, according to industry publication Grocery Trade Review.1 Therefore, owners and operators are always on the lookout for ways to cut costs. One variable that affects profits is energy.
August 6, 2014 By Paul Lin
The retail and shopping centre sectors account for about 3% of Canada’s secondary energy use—equalling about $3.6 billion in energy bills and 14.5 million tons of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions annually. Canada has more than 5000 large supermarkets, each consuming 5000MWh of electricity per year.
Since supermarkets are one of the most energy-intensive types of commercial buildings (refrigeration and lighting account for 80% of typical electricity use), reducing the amount of energy required to operate them is a critical piece of the puzzle. Fortunately, most existing facilities provide a lot of low-hanging fruit in potential energy savings. Additionally, energy upgrades can offer many other benefits, including improved food safety and reduced spoilage.
Among supermarket operating expenses, energy costs are one of the most controllable. Through energy-efficient equipment and practices, even new facilities can save 20% or more. This degree of cost-cutting can improve the bottom line, increase profits and put facilities in a more price-competitive position. For example, over five years, a 20% reduction in energy use adds almost $200,000 to cash flow—and the bottom line—for a 40,000-sf store. Since it takes $50 to $80 in sales (on average) to match the cash flow produced by $1 in energy cost savings, this 20% reduction in energy cost is the equivalent of adding $2 to $3 million to annual sales at the top line.1
Retail stores rely on coolers to display inventory. Reach-in coolers allow self-service access to various items. These coolers and freezers have a separate fan motor for every door section, and include ‘anti-sweat heaters’ to prevent the condensation of warm, outside air from forming on the cold, aluminum framing.
While these coolers are attractive, spacious and effective for retail display, they are incredibly inefficient, and account for more than half of a store’s energy consumption.2
For example, evaporator fans operate 24/7, and each motor typically costs over $500 annually to operate. The anti-sweat heaters also operate at all times; for a run of 12 doors, they can cost more than $800 per year.
Reducing cooler costs
Replacing old, inefficient shaded-pole motors in coolers and freezers with cool-running, brushless electronically commutated motors (ECMs) makes a dramatic impact on energy costs. ECMs also connect to controllers, allowing them to operate at low speed when the compressors are idle. Many ECM motors can reach efficiencies as high as 82%.
An ECM can be programmed to function at low speed then turn to high speed when controlled by an external fan speed controller for walk-in cooler/freezer applications. ECMs are permanent magnet, three-phase motors operating on single-phase input power. This means less wasted energy on the rotor, driving greater efficiency—especially at non-peak speeds.
Two other motors used in grocery store applications are the permanent split-capacitor (PSC) and shaded-pole.
PSC (permanent split-capacitor)
A PSC motor has neither a starting switch nor a capacitor strictly for starting. Instead, it has a run-type capacitor permanently connected in series with the start winding. This makes the start winding an auxiliary winding once the motor reaches running speed. Since the run capacitor must be designed for continuous use, it cannot provide the starting boost of a starting capacitor. Typical starting torques of PSC motors are low—from 30% to 150% of rated load—so these motors are not for hard-to-start applications.
Shaded-pole motors have only one main winding and no start winding. Starting is by means of a design that rings a continuous copper loop around a small portion of each motor pole. This ‘shades’ that portion of the pole, causing the magnetic field in the ringed area to lag the field in the unringed portion. The reaction of the two fields gets the shaft rotating.
As the shaded-pole motor lacks a start winding, starting switch or capacitor, it is electrically simple and inexpensive. Plus, speed can be controlled merely by varying voltage, or through a multi-tap winding. Mechanically, shade-pole motor construction allows high-volume production. In fact, these are usually considered ‘disposable’ motors, as they are cheaper to replace than repair.
ECM significantly outperforms both shaded-pole and permanent split-capacitor technology. Efficiencies are three times higher than shaded-pole motors and 45% higher than PSC.3 So, in addition to the reliable and quiet unit bearing design, the ECM provides users greater reliability and excellent energy savings.
ECM also maintains efficiency across its speed range, whereas an induction motor’s efficiency plummets when its rated speed is altered. In addition to the direct benefits, there are numerous indirect advantages, including ‘cooler’ motor operation that creates less heat load on the conditioned space when used with evaporator coils.
The ability to replace traditional shaded-pole motors with more efficient ECM motors was confirmed by researchers at the Food Service Technology Center (FSTC) in testing for Pacific Gas & Electric Co. The testers installed and monitored two ECM motors in a walk-in freezer. The motor employed a permanent magnet, three-phase, brushless DC motor combined with a built-in electronic alternating current (AC) inverter that was used to drive it. The freezer evaporator unit originally came equipped with two shaded-pole 1/15-hp fan motors, but was retrofit.
The initial measurement of the original shaded-pole motors’ input power was 271 watts with the two fans combined. Following the retrofit, the power was 88 watts for two fans combined. Overall, the ECM equipped fans used 67% less energy.
In addition to significant cost savings through the use of energy-efficient equipment and practices, there are rebates and financial incentives offered by utilities and government bodies to consider. In Ontario, for example, the Process and Systems upgrade program helps businesses get up to 70% of funding toward major energy-saving upgrade projects. This includes valuable financial incentives and technical expertise needed to upgrade key systems, and make improved energy management a part of daily business.
Enbridge Gas’ retrofit program helps businesses with incentives when they invest in upgrading efficient equipment and systems that provide long-term environmental and financial benefits.
Provincial governments, too, are involved in rebates and incentives for energy-savings measures. For example, Manitoba has a rebate program specifically for commercial refrigeration that is leading the country, according to Canada’s Office of Energy Efficiency. Manitoba’s 24 rebates cover moving to energy-efficient equipment and technology upgrades.4
ECMs in action
The baseline store used in this example is a typical supermarket with a sales area of about 54,000 sf (but the information that follows can be applied to any supermarket larger than 2000 m2 [21,527 sf]).
Retail stores rely on coolers to display a huge inventory for their customers. The stock coolers operate with a series of refrigeration evaporators or coils. The coolers may include two, four, six or more refrigeration coils. Each evaporator has two to six fans and motors, equalling several million total kilowatts/year. Further, reach-in coolers and freezers have a separate fan motor for every door section.
The store replaced the shaded-pole motors in coolers and freezers with brushless ECMs. Then, the new motors were connected to EC motor controllers, allowing them to operate at low speed when the compressors were idle.
This upgrade provided an 80% reduction in electricity costs, and energy consumption was reduced 1426 kWh/day. This grocer, like most commercial refrigeration users, regarded high electricity bills as inevitable, assuming it was powerless to combat rates that increase annually. After these upgrades, however, the store is saving more than $5000/month.
Commitment to sustainability
Store owners want to reduce energy usage and costs, conserve natural resources and improve the bottom line and, with 5000 large supermarkets in the country, there are plenty of opportunities. This ongoing commitment is not only for stores’ bottom lines, but also to improve customers’ shopping experiences and align with their ever-growing sustainability practices. Progressive environmental initiatives are good for business in so many ways.
Paul Lin is manager of corporate energy marketing programs for Regal Beloit Corp. He has worked for nearly two decades in the electric motor industry with a focus on bringing energy-efficient products to market while doing policy work with government agencies. Lin has a Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Purdue University and can be reached at email@example.com .
1. “Discount wars push Canada’s mid-priced grocery stores upscale”, Marina Strauss, The Globe and Mail, tinyurl.com/qarmmju.
2. Visit tinyurl.com/o3swxyq.
3. “Motors: cutting cooling costs”, Marta Di Domizio and David McShane, Appliance Design, tinyurl.com/onfa83v.
4. “Capturing financial savings through energy efficiency in commercial refrigeration”, Paul Nastari, The Consultant (Q1 2008).
Photo 1: Reach-in cooler with upgraded motor.
Photo 2: Grocery store operation costs breakdown.
Photo 3: Motor primarily used in the evaporator of commercial refrigeration walk-in coolers and freezers, but can be used in many air-moving applications demanding high efficiency and dependability.
Print this page