News
ACEEE 2011 Scorecard – Energy efficiency gains traction in lagging states

Released today by ACEEE, “Opportunity Knocks: Examining Low-Ranking States in the State Energy Efficiency Scorecard” draws on a series of interviews with stakeholders in states ranked in the bottom 10 of the scorecard: Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, West Virginia and Wyoming.

“States are leading the way on energy efficiency, and while some have a head start, this report finds that every state can find ways to save energy,” said Steven Nadel, ACEEE executive director and a co-author of the report.

Despite their low rankings, each of the states examined in the report have successfully improved their energy efficiency in at least some way. Last week, Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin signed into law energy efficiency legislation that directs all state agencies and higher education institutions to achieve at least 20% improvement in energy efficiency by 2020.

“Up until now, hundreds of millions of dollars each year have been wasted on practices like keeping the lights on in empty government buildings. We can now expect that money either to be returned to taxpayers or to fund core services like education, transportation, public safety and health care,” said Fallin.

Other states are beginning to realize the benefits from energy efficiency, says ACEEE. In addition to Oklahoma, Alabama and South Carolina recently passed statewide building energy codes to ensure new homes and buildings are built to save energy from the start. A number of states, notably Kansas, have solid programs in place to plan and finance energy efficiency improvements in state government facilities.

While many more opportunities remain for these states, numerous barriers are holding up progress on energy efficiency. The most notable barrier, says ACEEE, is the perception that energy efficiency costs more than it is worth.

“States have a great opportunity knocking at their doors. Energy efficiency is an investment and, like any investment, there is a cost and return. Our research shows that the benefits of energy efficiency improvements substantially outweigh their costs in the long run and deserve attention from utilities and state governments seeking to lower energy costs for consumers,” said Michael Sciortino, ACEEE senior analyst and lead author of the report.

The report finds that a number of actions can advance energy efficiency and do not require major government spending or regulatory action. Like Oklahoma, states can advance energy efficiency projects in government facilities, as well as at universities and schools, using “innovative financing methods that allow projects to be paid for by using the savings generated by the installed energy efficiency measures”.

States can also adopt and enforce building energy codes, implement utility-sector energy efficiency programs where such programs cost less than building new power plants, and support deployment of combined heat and power (CHP) projects.

“The policies and programs we recommend in the report are tried and true. States that were low-ranking in the scorecard only a few years ago like Arkansas, Arizona, Michigan and Tennessee have all raised their scores by using these approaches,” said Rachel Young, a co-author of the report and analyst at ACEEE. “We hope this report is instructive for leaders seeking ways to save money and create jobs in their states.”

CLICK HERE to view the report.

CLICK HERE to view the 2011 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard.